What's considered largely an irritation in the U.S. threatens worldwide
social upheaval as hunger strains poor nations
By Laurie Goering
Tribune correspondent
April 13, 2008
NEW DELHI — To support his family of six, Raju sells plastic packets of
chilled water to commuters on a New Delhi roadside. Like many Indians, he
normally spends more than half of his monthly income to buy food.
But
over the past year, as world food prices have soared and inflation began
creeping up, the rice, lentils and wheat his family needs have begun to take as
much as 70 percent of his meager monthly salary of $77. With the other 30
percent of the family's income committed to rent, they have had to give up
buying vegetables—meat and milk have never been affordable—and will simply have
to go hungry if prices rise any further.
"We're barely managing," said
the 36-year-old, who goes by only one name.
With India's inflation
hitting 7 percent, "I don't see any improvement coming," he said. "There will be
riots if this gets worse."
As global food prices race upward, no place
demonstrates the growing risks to the planet as much as India — home to more
than half of the world's hungry.
Worldwide, food prices have soared 45
percent over the past year as surging oil prices make growing and transporting
food more expensive and as economic growth in emerging giants such as China and
India leads to rising demand for food, according to the United Nations' Food and
Agriculture Organization.
Ramped-up production of biofuels, particularly
in the U.S., also is taking an increasing share of the world's food production,
and droughts and floods possibly linked to global warming have slashed harvests
in leading grain producers such as Australia.
In richer developed
nations, where people spend an average of 10 to 15 percent of their disposable
income on food, price hikes have been a growing irritation. But in the
developing world, where most poor people spend at least half of their income to
eat, rising costs threaten to create major social unrest.
In Haiti, at
least five protesters were killed last week after hungry mobs tried to storm the
presidential palace, and on Saturday lawmakers voted to dismiss the country's
prime minister. Food riots have also flared across Africa's Sahel and in Mexico,
Uzbekistan and Morocco. Egypt's government has put the army to work baking
subsidized bread.
'No margin for survival'
All told, 33 countries around the
world are at risk of social upheaval as a result of acute increases in food and
energy prices, said Robert Zoellick, president of the World Bank, in a speech
this month. In countries where buying food requires half to three-quarters of a
poor person's income, "there is no margin for survival," he warned.
UN
officials said Friday that the problems are likely to persist despite an
expected increase in global cereal production over the next year.
"All
indications we have is that this is not a short-term effect," Jacques Diouf,
director general of the Food and Agriculture Organization, said at a news
conference in Rome.
India, which has more malnourished people than
anywhere else in the world—even more than sub-Saharan Africa in both absolute
and percentage terms—is so far not counted among the countries most in
danger.
Largely that's because its government runs the world's biggest
food aid program, an $8.4 billion effort that pushes 15 million tons of
subsidized wheat and rice a year to hundreds of millions of people. The United
Nations' World Food Program, the world's biggest food relief aid agency, by
comparison, ships just 5 million tons of food a year to 73 million hungry people
at a cost of $3.4 billion, WFP officials said.
India also enjoys an
impressive economic growth rate of better than 8 percent a year, deep cash
reserves of $300 billion and near-self-sufficiency in basic grains, all of which
have helped insulate it from the world food price shock.
But India has
the potential to play a big role in accelerating the world's developing food
crisis. With its population and its per capita demand for food growing faster
than its agricultural productivity, the nation of 1.1 billion is edging toward
becoming a net importer of food, a reality that could turn the current spikes in
international food prices into consistent highs for a decade or more as demand
grows, analysts say.
India, the world's biggest rice producer after
China, is also a major exporter of rice to Bangladesh, one of the poorest and
most vulnerable nations in the world. Its decision late last month to ban
exports of all but high-priced basmati rice could eventually hit hard at
Bangladesh and other hungry neighbors, which may be forced to start importing
food at prices higher than those they pay to India. So far Bangladesh has
received a limited exemption from the export curb.
Inflation hurting Indians
Inside India itself, inflation
is eroding the buying power of millions of people like Raju with little ability
to pay more for food. That is a huge political worry for India's ruling party,
which faces elections this year and already has begun pulling a variety of
economic levers, including cutting duties on imported food, in a desperate
effort to hold down prices.
India today sets its poverty line at an
income of about 33 cents a day, a third of the international extreme poverty
standard of $1 a day. As food prices rise, it may be forced to recalibrate its
calculation of the number of Indian families who need help, requiring the
government to add billions of dollars a year to a food aid budget that already
has surged 27 percent since the 2006-07 financial year.
"India's capacity
to cope is immense," said Gianpietro Bordignon, the World Food Program's India
director. "They have the biggest food safety net in the world. The question is
how long that will be affordable as the costs increase more and
more."
The World Food Program already faces deep cuts in its efforts
because of a $500 million budget shortfall caused largely by rising food
prices.
India hopes to address its own looming problem by increasing its
agricultural productivity, now just half that of China, which has much more
irrigated farmland, said Ramesh Chand, an agricultural economist at the National
Center for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research.
But in a country
where 60 percent to 70 percent of people make their living farming small plots
and there are few jobs for unskilled labor in the cities, moving small farmers
off their land to expand larger-scale agriculture would be difficult.
A
better option for cutting hunger, Indian agricultural economists say, would be
new government-funded work programs to build irrigation canals and improve a
disastrous infrastructure, particularly rural roads that are now so overburdened
and potholed that more than 30 percent of the country's agricultural produce
spoils on the way to market.
Increasing agricultural output fast enough
will be tough, particularly with the government announcing last week that it
intends to put 30 million acres into biofuel crops by 2017.
In India, as
in much of the world, nobody is quite sure whether world food production will
increase to meet growing demand—as has happened repeatedly over the centuries—or
whether a new era of permanently higher prices and hungrier times is on the
horizon.
"It's a very difficult question," said Arif Husain, a food
policy analyst with the World Food Program in Rome. "Nobody knows what the long
run means right now. We are in uncharted waters."