Judge
Orders Bush Administration to Issue Global Warming Report
By Karen Gullo
Aug. 21 (Bloomberg) -- The Bush administration violated U.S. law
by failing to produce a study on the impact of global warming and
must issue a summary by March, a federal judge ruled.
District Judge Saundra Armstrong in Oakland, California, said the
U.S. government ``unlawfully withheld action'' required under the
Global Change Research Act of 1990 to update a research plan and
scientific assessment of climate change.
The law mandates the research plan should be revised every three
years and the assessment every four years. The last research plan
was in 2003 and the last assessment was published in 2000.
Greenpeace International and two other environmental groups who say
the U.S. government suppresses science on climate change sued in
November seeking a court order to produce the reports.
``As the research plan is now more than a year overdue, the court
orders that a summary of the revised proposed research plan be
published in the Federal Register no later than March 1,'' Armstrong
said in the order today. The scientific assessment must be produced
by May 31, she said.
The administration will review the ruling before commenting, said
White House spokeswoman Dana Perino. Calls to the U.S. Climate
Change Science Program and Martin LaLonde, a Justice Department
attorney involved in the case, weren't immediately returned.
President George W. Bush, citing economic reasons, in March 2001
rejected the Kyoto Protocol, a treaty among industrialized nations
that would have required cuts in carbon dioxide emissions and other
gases linked to global warming.
Government `Wrong'
The Bush administration said in court filings that it determined
``only recently that the initiation of a process to revise the
research plan has become necessary and advisable'' and that the
government has discretion about how to handle the revised reports,
which Armstrong said was ``wrong.''
The reports may be completed by the end of the year, government
lawyers said in court filings.
``This is the first court order specifically rebuking the Bush
administration for suppressing climate change science,'' said
Matthew Vespa, an attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity,
one of the groups that sued. ``The report will provide updated
information that all federal agencies will have to look at when
assessing the impact of climate change.''
The case is Center for Biological Diversity v. Brennan, 06-7062,
U.S. District Court, for the Northern District of California (San
Francisco).
To contact the reporter on this story: Karen Gullo in San
Francisco at kgullo@bloomberg.net .
Last Updated: August 21, 2007 17:30 EDT